viernes, 31 marzo 2023
Visitas totales a la web: 88477841

El portal de los profesionales de seguridad y emergencias

Nº 1 del mundo en español en seguridad global

Soluciones de seguridad global

The attack on Judge Salas’ family highlights concerns over judicial safety

Ben Kesslen

Federal judges get protection from the U.S. Marshals Service but still often face threats for their work.

For U.S. District Judge Joan Lefkow, the brutal attack on fellow federal Judge Esther Salas’ family, which left her husband Mark Anderl grievously injured and their son, Daniel, dead, had a terrible familiarity.

Fifteen years ago, Lefkow’s husband and mother were shot and killed by an aggrieved former plaintiff who had appeared in her court and then, angered by her courtroom decisions, hid in her basement apparently with the intent to kill her. Instead, he meted out revenge on her family.

U.S. District Judge Joan Humphrey Lefkow holds her hand over her heart as she watches pallbearers carry her husbands casket into St. Luke’s Episcopal Church on March 5, 2005, in Evanston, Ill. Lefkow found her husband Michael Lefkow and her mother Donna Humphrey murdered when she came home from work on Feb. 28.Jeff Roberson / AP file

Federal judges are entitled to a home and court security systems and protection by the U.S. Marshals Service, which has provided security for federal judges and courtrooms across the country since 1789. The killing of Salas’ son and the shooting of her husband allegedly by an anti-feminist lawyer highlights the problem on which Lefkow and the Federal Judges Association have spent over a decade sounding the alarm: judges are being threatened and attacked, often by those angered by decisions made from the bench.

According to data compiled by the Marshals Service, some 4,449 documented threats and “inappropriate communication” were recorded against protected federal judges, jurors and other members of the federal judiciary in 2019. That number is unusually high: On average, the service has seen 1,350 threats and inappropriate communications against such individuals annually since 2015.

Lefkow, a judge for the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, described the tragedy that befell her own family as “grueling” in an interview with NBC News on Monday. In her grief, she lobbied Congress to do more to protect judges like herself.

“The horror of it is unbearable,” she said of the attack on Salas’ family. The man who killed Lefkow’s family, Bart A. Ross, committed suicide. He left behind a note detailing his plans to shoot Lefkow, and a list of 26 others – including judges, lawyers and doctors.

The alleged suspect in the attack on the Salas family, Roy Den Hollander, apparently also had a photo of another female judge, New York State Chief Judge Janet Difiore, in his car. New York Governor Andrew Cuomo ordered state police to guard the judge as a precaution.

Deadly attacks against judges remain relatively uncommon in the United States. Since 1979, four federal judges have been assassinated. But as their role becomes increasingly politicized, judges are receiving record numbers of threats.

In February 2017, Seattle federal Judge James Robart temporarily blocked President Donald Trump’s travel ban that barred people from Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen from entering the U.S. for 90 days. Angered by Robart’s decision, Trump criticized the judge on Twitter, calling him a “so-called judge” who made a “ridiculous” decision.

Shortly after, the threats against Robart began, according to the American Bar Association, and he received more than 42,000 letters, emails and calls, including more than 100 death threats.

“Here’s the president of the United States saying this person is not a judge, implying you can disregard his ruling, and saying these people are flooding into the country to rape your wife, rape your children and it’s all his fault,” Robart said at a panel in 2019 hosted by the Bar Association about the undermining of the court system. “I think that crosses a line from legitimate criticism of a ruling and goes into a whole different area.”

U.S. District Judge James Robart rules on the travel ban imposed by President Donald Trump on Feb. 3, 2017 in Seattle.U.S. District Court via AFP – Getty Images file

Lefkow emphasized that this problem isn’t new. “When my husband and my mother was killed, there was a lot of vitriol directed at judges,” she said, citing right-wing news that stoked sentiments against people in her profession, and a fringe online “jail for judges” campaign.

In 2015, a Houston man shot U.S. District Judge Julie Kocurek in front of her family. Kocurek survived the assassination attempt, but underwent dozens of surgeries to recover from her injuries. Her would-be assassin was a plaintiff who had a case before her court and said he wanted to scare her. According to reports, he had tracked the judge over time.

Liz Lang Miers, a former federal judge in Texas, said “there are a lot of threats on judges, period.” The threats, she added, don’t always come from the biggest cases, like they did in Robart’s case, but often from a case in which someone “personally perceived they’ve been wronged.”

“It can seem to be spurred by an order someone misperceives or a ruling they think is an attack, as opposed to just understanding the justice system,” she said.

Lang Miers and Lefkow both offered their support for Salas.

“There are no words that will allay the grief that Judge Salas and her husband must bear after losing their son to gun violence,” Lefkow said. “I suppose if it’s any comfort, I can only say that they are not alone.”

CORRECTION (Aug. 3, 2020, 1:10 p.m. ET): A previous version of this article misstated who received documented threats and inappropriate communications as tracked by the Marshals Service. It was federal judges, jurors and other members of the federal judiciary, not just judges.

Fecha de publicaciónjulio 21, 2020

BELT.ES no se hace responsable de las opiniones de los artículos reproducidos en nuestra Revista de Prensa, ni hace necesariamente suyas las opiniones y criterios expresados. La difusión de la información reproducida se realiza sin fines comerciales. 

Listado de Expertos


Profesión militar: Obediencia debida frente a la obligación de disentir

Con ocasión de la realización de estudios en el Instituto Universitario Gutiérrez Mellado tuve la ocasión de leer y analizar una serie de documentos de opinión que trataban en profundidad las diferentes facetas presentes en el campo de las relaciones cívico-militares; temas que , habitualmente, no han estado presentes en los diferentes cursos y actividades formativas en la enseñanza militar, ni, por supuesto, en la civil.

El amor de Macarena Olona por la Guardia Civil empieza por su pareja, un joven oficial condecorado

El padre de su hijo llegó a la Benemérita como militar de carrera y, los que le...

La artillería ‘made in USA’ comprada por Marruecos que deja fuera de juego a España

El país magrebí sigue reforzando sus fuerzas armadas a golpe de talonario, y no lo hace de...

Últimas noticias

Cómo la inteligencia artificial detecta los robos en las tiendas

La empresa Veesion ha desarrollado un software que identifica los hurtos después de analizar los gestos y...

La ‘guerra mundial’ por conseguir el láser más potente del mundo: EEUU frente a China y Europa

El recién inaugurado ZEUS en EEUU reaviva la carrera por los láseres de alta intensidad, con múltiples aplicaciones en medicina, energía y...

Conoce las especialidades de la Policía Nacional

En España, cada vez con más frecuencia, los ciudadanos optan por estudiar una oposición ya que les asegura un puesto de trabajo fijo...

Los delitos de atentado contra agentes de la autoridad se disparan

De 9.967 casos en 2018 repuntaron a más de 11.000 en 2020, el año del confinamiento. En 2021 se registró un nuevo...

Guía Europea para la protección contra inundaciones

CEPREVEN decidió editar este Documento Técnico, en colaboración con el CONSORCIO DE COMPENSACIÓN DE SEGUROS, como respuesta al impacto de los Riesgos...